The ADSA6GPX1-2E utilizes a PCI Express 2.0 x1 interface with dual eSATA ports available externally. What sets this cards apart from other on the market is its compatibility as a port multiplier.

eSATA: The SATA interface for external ... At the same time, a PCIe 1.0 card can also be used in a computer with a higher PCI Express version. However, it will not work any faster as a result.

a PCI Express (PCIe)-based expansion card for Power Mac G5s that provides two external serial ATA (eSATA) ports, for attaching fast external storage systems. It costs $99.95. As a PCIe card ...

But I’ll recommend the two-port SimpleTech ProSpeed eSATA PCI Express Card despite its rather high $70 list price (as I write this, you can buy it for $60 at Best Buy). Why? The software on the ...

The $80 card will ship in April. The card supports data rates up to 125MB/sec. The G-Tech eSATA PCI-Express adapter is particularly well-suited for users who need to transfer multistream ...

First Serial ATA PCI Express host adapter with external eSATA Ports for Power Mac G5 ... Both the Tempo SATA E4P and Tempo SATA E4i cards feature a performance bandwidth of 3Gb per second ...

The IDE JBOD (just a bunch of disks)/RAID (redundant array of inexpensive disks) PCIe (PCI Express) controller adds an extra channel, RAID capability, and Aspencore network News & Analytics Products ...

Addonics unveiled their latest add-in card and this time it is an SATA host controller, more specifically an eSATA host controller. The AD4ES6GPX4 uses a single PCIe 4-lane slot and in return it ...

The card will provide two eSATA port and it has built-in 3Gbps SATA controller. Unfortuntely, the ExpressCard slot in MacBook Pros uses USB 2.0 controller instead of the PCI Express bus.

Features of the new adapter include: two external eSATA ports; data rates to 125 MB/sec when used with G-Tech G-SATA storage solutions; single-lane (x1) PCI-Express transfer rates up to 2.5 Gbps; and ...

It begs the question - why haven't we seen more PCI Express cards on the market? We simply can't answer that, we can only surmise that PCI is cheaper to produce and more widely accepted.