A new rule by the EPA to no longer consider the economic cost of human health from two major air pollutants in its ...
The EPA won't consider the economic costs of harms to human health, at least for now. Legal and health experts are concerned ...
The change means the EPA will focus rules for two pollutants only on the cost to industry, part of a realignment under ...
Experts fear consequences will include health complications, stalled industry, a society further disconnected from science ...
In a reversal, the agency plans to calculate only the cost to industry when setting pollution limits, and not the monetary ...
MACH Engineering reports that industrial air pollution harms economies by increasing healthcare costs and reducing ...
When indoor air pollutants enter the lungs, they can trigger inflammation and place long-term strain on the heart and ...
People across the globe, especially in low-income countries, continue to use solid fuels like coal, wood and plant waste for ...
Internal emails reveal that the EPA plans to stop assigning a dollar value to the health benefits of reducing 2 major pollutants: Fine particulate matter, known as PM2.5, and ozone. Instead, the ...
Low-income and ethnically diverse communities in post-industrial Northern English cities face up to 33% more air pollution ...
Some results have been hidden because they may be inaccessible to you
Show inaccessible results
Feedback